A link at the start of a shift.
People who don't sit at a desk and never open an internal email. The link goes to a phone, which is the only reason it reaches them at all.
The same engine runs behind every program we operate. What changes is the population, the instruments and who's allowed to see what, and all three of those are decisions you make with us before anything goes out.
Not a clinical record, not a school record. It sits on its own footing, with its own instruments and its own reporting, and getting that wrong is an employment law problem rather than a software problem. Who's taking it is the first question we ask, because the answer sets everything after it.
Ten minutes per person wherever they take it. What changes is who's taking it, which instruments we pick with you, and how it reaches the people who never open an internal email.
Employers is what's on this page today. When we open a new kind of program you'll see it here, and not before. We'd rather answer a smaller question properly than a bigger one vaguely.
People who don't sit at a desk and never open an internal email. The link goes to a phone, which is the only reason it reaches them at all.
Crews who start and finish somewhere other than an office. One tablet, handed round, and it clears itself between people so the next person sees nothing.
The window stays open as long as you want it open, because the point is that everybody gets a real chance rather than a fifteen minute slot they were never going to make.
This is the question that stops most of these conversations, so here's the whole answer in one place rather than buried in a contract. Each line is named once down the middle, with your side of it on the left and theirs on the right.
The chart at the foot is the whole of what reaches you.
We train your people rather than handing over a login and wishing them luck. What the instruments are, what the bands mean, what to do with an elevated result, and what they're not qualified to do with one.
Follow-up runs through Mindwell Telehealth, a separate brand on purpose. Providers hold their own licenses and their own liability, the person books it themselves, and none of it comes back through you or through HR.
Nothing here needs an IT project. The longest item is usually deciding who gets told when a result comes back elevated, and that's a conversation rather than a build.
If yours isn't here, ask us directly and you'll get a straight answer rather than a brochure.
No. What you receive is counts and bands for the population. There's no name, no ID, no item answer and no individual score in anything we send you, and there's no setting that turns one on. If that's a problem for the program you had in mind, we're the wrong vendor and we'll say so in the first meeting rather than the fourth.
Neither, and that's the point. Screening somebody as an employee is employee health data, which sits on its own footing with its own instruments and its own reporting. We don't blend it with the clinical programs we run for hospitals or the student programs we run for districts, because they're not the same thing in law.
The result is flagged at scoring with the items that triggered it, and it goes to the person you named. Who that is, how fast they're told, and what they do next is written into your protocol before go-live rather than decided in the moment. The completion screen also carries crisis line details for the person themselves. Instruments that carry a suicidal ideation item are treated differently: any endorsement triggers review, whatever the total score says.
That's your decision to make and ours to build around. Consent is captured before the first question either way, and a decline reaches you as a number rather than a person, so nobody can be managed differently for having said no.
Over a hundred, and we tell you which is which. The clinical core is published and validated: PHQ-9, GAD-7, the NIMH ASQ suite, NIDA and NIAAA substance tools, PCL-5. Around those we've built our own indicators for what no validated instrument covers, like burnout, caregiver strain and attendance barriers. We select them with you, they're age-gated so only valid tools appear, and they run in multiple languages.
No. A screening indicates whether somebody may benefit from further evaluation. Diagnosis is made by a qualified professional, nothing we produce substitutes for that, and every report we deliver says so on its face.
It depends on headcount, instruments and how much training you want. Tell us your headcount and we'll give you a straight number.
Your headcount and who you want to reach is enough to start. We come back with what the program looks like, what it costs, and exactly what lands on your desk at the end of it.
info@ssgwellness.com